Posts

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has officially ruled that films made using generative AI tools remain eligible for Oscars, a move that reflects AI’s rising presence in film production and the industry’s struggle to define boundaries around it.

Highlights:

AI won’t affect eligibility, with the Academy stating that using generative tools “neither helps nor harms” a film’s Oscar chances.

Human creative input still matters, and remains a key factor in determining final nominations and winners.

Recent Oscar winners used AI, including The Brutalist, where AI refined Adrian Brody’s accent, and Emilia Perez, which featured AI-enhanced vocals.

Voting rules are tightening, requiring Academy members to view all films in a category before participating in final voting.

Artists continue to raise concerns, citing fears of job displacement, likeness abuse, and the loss of creative authenticity.

The decision opens the door for more AI-assisted films to compete and win at the highest level. But it also intensifies long-standing questions about authorship, ownership, and the future of human labor in creative work. As studios embrace the speed and efficiency of generative tools, the industry will need more than just eligibility rules to address what’s coming next.

RatedG.ai is elated at this pathbreaking news. Sharad Agarwal, the Founder of RatedG.ai commented, “ AI is not a passing tsunami. It is a permanent tectonic shift. This move by ‘The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences’ is going to provide a great impetus to AI Filmmaking.”